The petitioner failed to file a representation on two occasions, leading the High Court of Chhattisgarh to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.
dismissal of the writ petition due to want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 861 of 2017
---- Petitioner Versus
Surajpur (Chhattisgarh)
---- Respondents
For Petitioner None
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
06/04/2017
Since there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner even in two rounds, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss this petition for want of prosecution.
Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA
Nirala
Dwarika Dhish Tiwari
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health & Family Planning Department
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
