In a writ petition for the production of the respondent wife whom the petitioner alleged was illegally detained, the Court found she was present with parents and refused to go with the petitioner, stating no illegal detention existed. Consequently, the petition was disposed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPHC No. 14 of 2017
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
| For Petitioner : | Shri Ali Asgar, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent Nos.1 to 4 : | Shri UNS Deo, Government Advocate |
| For Respondent No.5 & 6. : | Shri Mateen Siddique, Advocate |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma
Order On Board
P. Diwaker, J
10/08/2017 (Later on in Chamber)
Sd/Sd/(P. Diwaker) (R.P. Sharma) Judge Judge
roshan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court should issue directions for the production of the respondent (wife) who has explicitly refused to accompany the petitioner.
Jay Singh Rajput
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home
Collector, Bilaspur
Superintendent Of Police, Bilaspur
Thana Incharge, Police Station Sarkanda
Rine Rajan
Pritinker Diwaker
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
