The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the condonation of delay in filing IA No. 1 of 2017 and granted leave to the State to prefer a regular acquittal appeal under Section 378(3) of Cr.P.C. against an acquittal.
Delay condoned; leave to appeal granted; appeal admitted and registered as regular appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Order Sheet
CRMP No. 740 of 2017
State Of Chhattisgarh Versus Bhola Singh Rajput
| 09/08/2017 Mr. Vaibhav Govardhan, Panel Lawyer for the Applicant/ State. |
|---|
| Heard on I.A. No. 1 of 2017, application for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. Delay in filing the instant petition is condoned. The present petition has been filed under Section 378(3) of the Cr.P.C., seeking leave to appeal. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, leave as prayed for by the State is granted. Registry is directed to register the case as a regular acquittal appeal. Heard on admission. Admit. After registration of regular appeal, issue fresh notice to respondent on payment of process fee as per rule making the same returnable in twelve weeks. List this acquittal appeal for final hearing in due course. Sd/- Sd/- |
| (Pritinker Diwaker) (Ram Prasanna Sharma) Judge Judge |
Santosh
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone delay in filing the second appeal.
Whether to grant leave to prefer the regular acquittal appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
State Of Chhattisgarh
Bhola Singh Rajput
Pritinker Diwaker
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
