Disposed

Cement Corporation Of India Ltd. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Chhattisgarh HC7 Dec 2017WPC/1030/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought expeditious consideration of its pending mining lease renewal application and verified payment of dues. The High Court directed the State to decide the application promptly and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed without order as to costs after directing the State to consider the mining lease renewal application expeditiously.

Cement Corporation Of India Ltd. Vs State Of… — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPC No. 1030 of 2015

¶5

Cement Corporation Of India Ltd. Mandhar Cement Factory, Dist.- Raipur (Chhattisgarh), Through : Its General Manager, Cement Corporation Of India Ltd. Mandhar Cement Factory, Dist.- Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. S/o Through : Secretary, Department Of Mineral Resources, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, New Raipur Dist.Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶9

Director, Mines (Mineral Resources) Indrawati Bhawan, Second Floor, D- Block, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶10

The Collector, (Minerals/ Mining Section), O/o Collector, Distt.- Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶11

Union Of India, Through The Revisional Authority Under The Mineral Concession Rules 1960, Ministry Of Coal & Mines, Government Of India, New Delhi.

¶12

Under Secretary, Government Of India, Ministry Of Mines, Government Of India, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi.

¶13

---- Respondents

¶14

For Petitioner :	Mr. Vinod Deshmukh, Advocate.
For Respondents/State :	Mr. Arun Sao, Dy. Advocate General.

¶15

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶16

Order On Board

¶17

07/12/17

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner / Corporation's application for renewal of mining lease is pending consideration before the respondent authorities since 20.10.2014 which has not been considered and decided till date, who may be directed to decide the same expeditiously. He further submits that all the mining dues has been paid by the Corporation.

¶19

¶20

Mr. Sao, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State would submit that State Government will examine the matter.

¶21

Be that as it may, respondent No. 1 is directed to consider and dispose of the petitioner / Corporation's application for renewal of mining lease expeditiously in accordance with law.

¶22

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of. No order as to cost(s).

¶23

Sd/-

¶24

(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶25

Priyanka

Cement Corporation Of India Ltd. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Cement Corporation Of India Ltd. v. State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jagsai Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Laxmi Prasad Gupta Vs Mahaveer Agrawal and Ors.

Panik Ram Gupta Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Dhanesh Bandhe Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Reliance Infratel Limited Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Chief Executive Off. Dis. Co-Ope. Bank Vs Ganga Prasad Gupta and Others