Petitioner appeared without instructions. The High Court, on hearing of Writ Petition (C) No. 5573 of 2008, dismissed the petition due to lack of instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (C) No.5573 of 2008
Panik Ram Gupta, S/o Shri Kunu Ram Gupta, aged about 70 years, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Tharakpur, P.S. Punjipathra, Tahsil Gharghoda, District Raigarh (CG).
---- Petitioner
Versus
----Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Atul Pandey, Advocate For State/Respondents: Mr. Arun Sao, Deputy Advocate General and Mr.S.S. Baghel, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
2
06/12/2017
(1) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he has no instructions in the matter and, as such, the petition is dismissed.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
L/-
Panik Ram Gupta
State of Chhattisgarh
Collector, Raigarh
Sub Divisional Officer, Tahsil Gharghoda
Station House Officer, Police Station Punjipthra
Tahsildar, Tahsil Tamnar
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
