C. G. Grih Nirman Mandal v. M/s Sidharth Construction
Case brief
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. ( 227 ) No. 109…
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR W.P. ( 227 ) No. 109…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P. (227) No. 109 of 2017
---- Petitioners
Versus
M/s Sidharth Construction through- Prop. Narendra Parakh, S/o Late Panchhilal Parekh, R/o Parakh Mension, Gudiyari, Raipur (C.G.)
---- Respondent
For Petitioners : Mr. Sanjay Patel, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Y.C. Sharma, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
0 7 /04 /2016
(1) Learned counsel appearing for the parties would submit that this petition may be disposed of with a direction to the trial Court to decide the civil suit expeditiously preferably within a period of six moths as the plaintiff's evidence is in progress.
(2) Considering the prayer made by learned counsel appearing for the parties, the trial Court is directed to decide the civil suit expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
(3) With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands finally disposed of.
2
(4) For the period of three months, interim relief granted by this Court on 08.02.2017 shall remain in force.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
D/-
C.G. Grih Nirman Mandal Through Housing Commissioner, Head office-Shankar Nagar, Raipur
Executive Engineer, C.G. Grih Nirman Mandal, Vir Savarkar Nagar, Hirapur, Raipur
Estate Officer, C.G. Grih Nirman Mandal, Vir Savarkar Nagar, Hirapur, Raipur
M/s Sidharth Construction through Prop. Narendra Parakh, S/o Late Panchhilal Parekh, R/o Parakh Mension, Gudiyari, Raipur
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court