The Superintendent Engineer v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
The Division Bench disposed of this Writ Appeal by confirming the Single Judge's order directing respondents to consider the petitioner's representation. The Court held the issue of property acquisition was not for adjudication in this appeal and left the decision to the relevant department.
What did the court decide?
Writ Appeal closed affirming the order of the learned Single Judge directing respondents to consider the representation.
What the court decided
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WRIT APPEAL NO. 51 OF 2017
1. The Superintendent Engineer (Civil), DB Power Limited Bada Darha, P.S. & Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.)
2. The Superintendent Engineer (Civil), DB Power Limited Badadarha, P.S. & Tahsil Dabhra, District Janjgir Champa (C.G.). (wrongly mention by the petitioner in writ petition as no such post is in existence)
Through : D. B. Power Limited, having its Registered Office at : Block 1 A, Corporate Block, D B City Park, Area Hills, Opp. M P Nagar, Zone-I, Bhopal 462016 Madhya Pradesh.
Corporate Office :- 3rd Floor, Naman Corporate Link, Opp. Dena Bank, C-31, G-Block, Bandrakurla Complex, Bandra (E), Mumbai 400051. Represented By : Satyendra Pratap Singh, S/o. Shri Mahendra Pratap Singh, 35 Years, working as Manager (Land & Liaison) at D B Power Ltd. 2nd Floor Shree Krishna Complex, Chatanaiya Nagar, Dhimerapur Road Raigarh District Raigarh (C.G.)
… Appellants
Versus
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Writ Appeal should be decided on merits concerning representation regarding acquired or purchased property.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
DB Power Limited
- respondent
State of Chhattisgarh
- respondent
The Collector, Raigarh
- respondent
The Sub Divisional Officer (R), Kharsia
- respondent
Chhattisgarh State Power Generation Company Ltd.
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- WA/51/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court