The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed an application for withdrawal of a tax case, dismissing the appeal as withdrawn.
Allowed the application for withdrawal. Consequently, the tax case was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Tax Case No. 2 of 2017
Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Raipur
---- Appellant
Versus
Steel Authority of India Limited, Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
For Appellant : Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent : Shri Sandeep Dubey, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri P. Sam Koshy, Judge.
Order on Board
Per Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice
01/05/2017
1. Heard on I.A. No.01 of 2017, application for withdrawal of the above titled case.
2. For the reasons mentioned in the application, same (I.A. No.01 of 2017) is allowed. Consequently, tax case is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/Sd/-
(Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan) (P. Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE
Anu
Commissioner, Central Excise, Customs & Service Tax, Raipur
Steel Authority of India Limited, Bhilai Steel Plant, Bhilai, Chhattisgarh
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
