The present applicants are mother-in-law and sister-in-law of the complainant. On 05.02.2016, the husband of the complainant Tikkam Yadu had lodged a complaint at Mahila Thana, Raipur in respect of the pressure that the complainant was putting upon him based on which counseling was held by the Mahila Police, Raipur. In the counselling, as is evident from the documents enclosed with this bail application, it reflects that the complainant had categorically stated that she intended to live separately or else she should be given maintenance. Subsequently, the complainant left the matrimonial home and started living with her parents. In between, on 24.02.2016, the husband of the complainant also filed an application under Section 9 of Hindu Marriage Act seeking constitution of conjugal rights. As a counter to the said application, the complainant initially moved an application under Section 125 of CrPC which is still pending before the JMFC, Simga, Bhatapara and thereafter, the present complaint was lodged on 14.07.2016. A bare perusal of the complaint also reflects that the allegations levelled against the applicants are in respect of the alleged incident which occurred almost two years back.
