High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a review petition (Rev. No. 138 of 2013), holding that the underlying order sought to be reviewed did not survive as it was superseded by a 2014 Supreme Court order restoring the main writ petition.
Review petition disposed; Writ Petition No. 4686 of 2010 treated as restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
REVP No. 138 of 2013
1. Yogendranath Pandey, S/o Vikramaditya Pandey, aged about 43 years Upper Division Teacher, Pre-Middle School, State General Secretary, C.G. Shikshak Sangh, Near Garur Bhawan, Katora Talab, Raipur C.G.
2. Sharad Sharma S/o Ramakant Sharma, aged about 50 years Headmaster Primary School, Divisional Secretary, C.G. Shikshak Sangh, Near Garur Bhawan, Katora Talab, Raipur C.G.
---- Petitioners
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : The Secretary, Department of School Education, DKS Bhawan, Raipur C.G.
2. Director, Directorate of Public Education, Raipur C.G.
3. District Education Officer, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon C.G.
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : None appears For State : Shri J.K. Gilda, Advocate General.
Hon'ble Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Judgment on Board
Per Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan, Chief Justice
05.05.2017
1. It is noted in the order dated 01.05.2017 that the learned counsel for the Petitioner submitted that the directions issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court amounts to restoring WP(S) No.4686 of 2010 to file. We have verified the file of that writ petition. It is seen that through order dated 16.09.2014, Civil Appeals No. 8906-8932 of 2014 and connections were ordered directing among other things that WP(S) No. 4686 of 2010 will stand restored. Such order has been issued after setting aside the order impugned in the Civil Appeals. This means that the order sought to be reviewed no more survives.
2
2. Hence, this review petition is ordered holding that the order sought to be reviewed does not survive and WP(S) No. 4686 of 2010 shall be treated as restored to file by virtue of the order dated 16.09.2014 issued by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 8906-8932 of 2014 and connections. Writ Petition (S) No.4686 of 2010 is already listed in the final hearing list.
3. This review petition is ordered accordingly.
Sd/Sd/- (Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan) (P. Sam Koshy) Chief Justice Judge
Chandra
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order in the underlying writ petition still subsists for review purposes.
Yogendranath Pandey
Sharad Sharma
State of Chhattisgarh
Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
