The High Court granted regular bail to the third accused in an excise case where seizure witnesses failed to support the prosecution case before their examination.
Applicant is released on bail upon executing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with one surety of like sum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 5824 of 2017
Versus
| For the applicant : Mr. |
Pushpendra Patel, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent : Mr. |
Sangharsh Pandey, Panel Lawyer. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
11.09.2017
and George have been examined on 16.08.2017 and both these witnesses they have not supported the case of prosecution, therefore, the applicant has been falsely implicated in this case.
Sd/GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE
R a o
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is eligible for regular bail after seizure witnesses denied the prosecution case.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ram Mandal
State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
