Disposed

Smt. B. D. Khatkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC9 Sept 2017WPS/1475/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner challenged a transfer order. The State counsel stated they would not press the transfer order relating to the petitioner. The Lok Adalat held the transfer order quashed and the subsequent representation rejection infructuous, disposing the writ petition accordingly while reserving liberty for the State.

What did the court decide?

Impugned transfer order relating to petitioner stands quashed; subsequent order rejecting petitioner's representation has become infructuous.

Smt. B. D. Khatkar Vs State Of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT, BILASPUR

¶2

NATIONAL LOK ADALAT

¶3

Judge - Lok Adalat : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Goutam Bhaduri Member - Lok Adalat : Mr. Y.C. Sharma, Advocate

¶4

WPS No. 1475 of 2017

¶5

(Arising out of judgment/order dated 30.07.2016 passed by he Addl. Secretary, Health and family Welfare Department Raipur.)

¶6

Smt. B. D. Khatkar W/o Chayatram Dev Khatkar, Aged About 59 Years R/o Block Colony, Pamgarh, District Janjgir Champa (Chhattisgarh). --- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Chhattisgarh through : Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

¶9

Director, Health Services, Indrawati Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). --- Respondent

¶10

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner - Mr. Vikram Dixit, Advocate along-with Petitioner. For State/Respondents - Mr. A.S. Kachhawaha, Addl. Advocate General and Mr.Gary Mukhopadhyay, Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Dy. Govt. Advocates.

¶11

O R D E R

¶12

(Passed on 09^th September, 2017)

¶13

Learned State counsel submits that they will not press upon the impugned transfer order dated 30.07.2016 (Annexure P-2) so far as it relates to the petitioner who is at Serial No.5.

¶14

In view of the above statement, it appears that the relief as has been sought by the petitioner, has been granted by the State. Therefore, the impugned transfer order dated 30.07.2016 (Annexure P-2) so far as it relates to the petitioner stands quashed. Consequently, the order Annexure P-1 dt. 02.11.2016 whereby the petitioner's representation was rejected, has become infructuous.

¶15

However, the State shall be at liberty to pass a fresh order, if they so desire.

¶16

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed in terms of the above submission.

¶17

Sd/Sd/(Goutam Bhaduri) (Y.C. Sharma) Judge -Lok Adalat Member – Lok Adalat High Court of Chhattisgarh High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur Bilaspur

Smt. B. D. Khatkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. B. D. Khatkar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harish Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

State Of Chhattisgarh Vs Devnarayan Yadav

Johar Singh Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Dr. Tukaram Kunwar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Akinchan Choudhury Vs Chhattisgarh Rajya Beej Avam Krishi Vikas Nigam Limited

Dilip Kumar Vinodia Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.