Allowed

Santosh Yadav @ Batu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC24 Nov 2017MCRC/5222/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail application of Santosh Yadav, an accused in kidnapping and POCSO charges. The Court noted the prosecutrix had accompanied the accused voluntarily and the applicant had been in jail since April 2017, leading to an order for release on personal bond.

What did the court decide?

Applicant to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond for Rs. 25,000 with one surety in the like sum.

Santosh Yadav @ Batu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2017)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶2

MCRC No. 5222 of 2017

¶3

Santosh Yadav @ Batu S/o Naresh Kumar Yadav Aged About 19 Years R/o Indira Nagar Ward- 06 Supela, Police Station Supela, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

¶4

---- Applicant Versus State Of Chhattisgarh Through: Police Station Supela, District - Durg Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Applicant : Mr. Ravi Bhagat, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer

¶5

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma Order On Board

¶6

24/11/2017

¶7

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 302/2017 registered at Police Station- Supela, District Durg (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 363,366,376 of the IPC and Section 18 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences of Act, 2012.

¶8

As per the prosecution case, the prosecutrix is a minor who has been kidnapped by the applicant for forcing her to marry.

¶9

Counsel for the applicant submits that the statement of the prosecutrix recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. in which she stated that she married with the applicant, therefore, the applicant may be enlarged on bail.

¶10

Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

¶11

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.

¶12

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, that the prosecutrix left the house of her own will and visited with the applicant without any instigation and further considering the fact that the applicant is in jail since 17.04.2017, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

¶13

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed.

¶14

It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.

¶15

Sd/-

¶16

(Ram Prasanna Sharma) Judge

¶17

Santosh

Santosh Yadav @ Batu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Santosh Yadav @ Batu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhuvneshwar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Gangaram and Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Panchuram Tandon Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Arun Kumar Vs Smt. Bharti Miri

Azad Sagar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Rahul Bhavsagar Vs State Of Chhattisgarh