Revision against Family Court order enhancing maintenance. High Court held that Section 125 inquiry is summary and awarded amount is not unreasonable despite respondent's income.
Revision dismissed; order of the Family Court enhancing maintenance to Rs. 2000/- per month upheld.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRR No. 1086 of 2017
(Arising out of judgment/order dated 03.08.2017 in Case No. 675/2016 of the learned Judge Family Court, Bilaspur )
Arun Kumar S/o Shri Chhotelal Miri, Aged About 31 Years R/o Village Amlidihi, Police Station Lormi, Tahsil Lormi, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
Smt. Bharti Miri D/o Ramayan Das Lahre, Aged About 28 Years Occupation Aanganbadi Assistant, Mini Basti Jarhabhatha, Bilaspur, R/o Jarhabhatha, Police Station Civil Lines, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
| For Applicant | : Mr. Ganesh Ram Verman, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent | : None |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma Order On Board
24.11.2017
2
Sd/(Ram Prasanna Sharma) JUDGE
Santosh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an Anganbadi Assistant earning Rs. 2,000 per month is entitled to maintenance under Section 125 Cr.P.C.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Arun Kumar S/o Shri Chhotelal Miri
Smt. Bharti Miri D/o Ramayan Das Lahre
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
