Revisioner sought to withdraw the petition citing availability of other remedies. The court dismissed the petition with liberty to seek other lawful remedies.
dismissed with liberty to seek other remedies
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
( Single Bench : Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma)
CRR No. 914 of 2017
---- Revisioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For revisioner : Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate. For respondent/State : Mr. Anil S. Pandey, G.A.
Order on board.
20-11-2017
Sd/-
(Ram Prasanna Sharma) Judge
Raju
State of Chhattisgarh
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
