Revision filed by Smt. Phoolmati Rajwade was dismissed for want of prosecution as her counsel stated she had served the sentence and had no intention of prosecuting the revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Criminal Revision No.815 of 2017
---- Revisioner/Applicant
Versus
---- Non Revisioner/Respondent
For Revisioner/applicant : Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate For respondent/State : Shri Lav Sharma, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma Order On Board
22.11.2017
1 . Learned counsel for the revisioner submits that the revisioner has served out the entire period of sentence awarded to her by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Baikunthpur and affirmed by the Additional Session judge(FTC), Baikunthpur Distt. Korea (CG) and now she does not want to prosecute this revision.
2 . In view of the statement of learned counsel for the revisioner, the revision is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Ram Prasanna Sharma)
JUDGE
Bini
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
