Mannu @ Ram Manuj v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
In an application for regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C., the High Court rejected the plea holding that the case primarily attracted Section 307 IPC due to the use of an iron rod and life-dangerous injury to the head, making it unfit for bail.
What did the court decide?
Application for grant of regular bail is rejected.
What the court decided
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
MCRC No. 5236 of 2017
- Mannu @ Ram Manuj (Wrongly Mentioned In Cause Title Of Ordersheet As Munu) S/o Shri Bholaram, Aged About 21 Years, Caste- Chamar, R/o Village- Kanchanpur, Police Station & Tehsil- Baikunthpur, DistrictKoriya, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
- State Of Chhattisgarh Through S H O Police Station- Baikunthpur, District Koriya, Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For applicant : Mr. Pushkar Sinha, Advocate. For respondent/State. : Mr. Luv Sharma, Panel Lawyer
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. given that the injury caused is dangerous to life and required an iron rod as a deadly weapon.
Whether the application for regular bail is a fit case for release considering the gravity of the offence under Section 307 IPC involving assault on a vital part.
Whether the application for grant of regular bail should be allowed or rejected based on the medical evidence and circumstances of the assault.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mannu @ Ram Manuj
- respondent
State Of Chhattisgarh
Coram
Ram Prasanna Sharma
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- MCRC/5236/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court