The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a revision petition challenging maintenance awarded to a wife who deserted the husband. The Court held the amount was reasonable and observed that lack of conjugal rights applications does not negate maintenance duties under Section 125 CrPC.
Revision dismissed; interim relief and additional document applications disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRR No. 766 of 2017
(Arising out of judgment/order dated 28.12.2016 in Case No. 110/2015 of the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Baikunthpur District Koriya (C.G.)
Kashiram S/o Tejiram, Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Bade Salhi, Tehsil Khadgawan, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
Vimla W/o Kashiram, Aged About 25 Years R/o Village Kotora, Tehsil Baikunthpur, District Koriya Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent For Applicant : Ms. K. Tripti Rao, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma
Order On Board
03.11.2017
2
maintenance of Rs. 2000/- per month to the respondent, who is wife of the applicant.
3
wrong for not living together. Issue of day today dispute between the husband and the wife is also not settled in such summery procedure which is only provided for day today maintenance.
Sd/(Ram Prasanna Sharma)
JUDGE
2 issues framed by the court
Whether maintenance awarded by Family Court is unreasonable given the applicant's income.
Whether the husband's failure to file for restitution of conjugal rights affects maintenance liability.
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Kashiram S/o Tejiram
Vimla W/o Kashiram
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
