High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a revision petition against conviction and sentence for cheque dishonour under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, as the parties had settled the matter and the complainant received the agreed compensation.
Revision petition disposed of with acquittal of the accused based on settlement.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SB: Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma
CRR No. 339 of 2006
---- Revisioner
Versus
---- Respondent
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For revisioner : Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate. For respondent : Mr. D.K. Gwalre, Advocate.
3-11-2017
revisioner who is complainant of the case has settled and compounded the matter and received the cheque amount. Compounding offence is recorded and the revisioner is acquitted of the charge under Section 138 of the Act, 1881.
Sd/-
(Ram Prasanna Sharma) Judge
Raju
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision against conviction under Section 138 of the Act, 1881 should be disposed of given the settlement of the matter.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Prakash Pannalal
Pandurang Bhamkar
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
