The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed a revision petition nunc pro tunc as it had been withdrawn voluntarily by the applicant prosecutrix.
Revision dismissed as withdrawn by the applicant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRR No. 487 of 2008
---- Applicant (Prosecutrix)
Versus
---- Respondents
| For Applicant : Shri Shrawan Agrawal, Advocate. |
|---|
| For Respondent No.1 : Smt. Madhunisha Singh, P.L. |
| For Respondent No.2 : None. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Hon'ble Shri Justice Ram Prasanna Sharma
Order On Board
Per P. Diwaker, J
16/08/2017
interested in prosecuting this revision and seeks to withdraw the same.
Sd/Sd/(P. Diwaker) (R.P. Sharma) Judge Judge
roshan
Simran Kaur @ Simpal
State Of Chhattisgarh
Jaiwardhan @Monu Dubey
Pritinker Diwaker
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
