witness, she saw the accused/appellant with one acquitted accused and narrated the incident to her uncle PW/1, who lodged the FIR Ex.P/1. Reverting to contents of FIR Ex.P/1, it demonstrates that the FIR Ex.P/1 was lodged against an unknown person. Further, the contents of FIR goes to show that after hearing the sound, PW/1 woke up and saw one person wearing white shirt moving out of her house whereas in her Court statement she has stated that when accused/appellant came to her house he was wearing red colour shirt. That apart, when this witness was confronted with her diary statement, wherein she has not stated anything about seeing any of the accused, she states that she had made such statement but if it was not recorded in her diary statement she could not tell the reason. If PW/1 had seen the accused/appellant in her house then the named FIR would have been lodged but the same has not been done. Considering the above discrepancy and inconsistency on material point, the evidence of this witness do not inspire confidence of this Court and as such, it would be hazardous to place any reliance thereon.
