This order appoints counsel from the High Court Legal Services Committee to represent an absent appellant in an old appeal, though the appeal was not disposed of in this proceeding.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRA No. 614 of 2002
Ramavatar Verma Versus State Of Chhattisgarh
| 08/08/2017 None for the appellant even when the case is called for hearing in the second round. |
|---|
| Smt. Smita Ghai, P.L. for the State. Despite service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. |
| Considering the fact that the appeal is of the year 2002, we feel it appropriate to appoint some counsel from the High Court Legal Services Committee to represent the appellant in the case. Shri Aman Kesharwani, counsel who is in the panel list of High Court Legal Services Committee, is appointed as counsel to represent the appellant in this case. |
| Copy of paper book is handed over to Shri Kesharwani. The case be taken in the second half. |
| Secretary, High Court Legal Services Committee to issue authorisation letter in favour of Shri Aman Kesharwani. |
| Sd/- Sd/- |
| (Pritinker Diwaker) (Ram Prasanna Sharma) Judge Judge |
vijay
Ramavatar Verma
State Of Chhattisgarh
Pritinker Diwaker
Ram Prasanna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
