near her, threatened her with death, thereafter removed her underwear and had done bad work. She has stated that after the incident she came out and went to the house of Chaplain and narrated the entire incident to him and he asked her to go and inform her mother. She has stated that she narrated the incident to her mother and then lodged the report. In cross-examination the prosecutrix remained firm and had categorically denied the fact that she has falsely implicated the appellant. She has also denied the fact that she was subject to rape by one Ashok and at the instance of the Investigating Officer she is falsely implicating the accused/appellant. Smt. Kamla Bai (PW-2) is the mother of the prosecutrix. She has stated that the prosecutrix came to her weeping and narrated about the incident and the manner in which she was subjected to bad work. She has denied the fact that the prosecutrix informed her that she was subjected to bad work by one Ashok. She has further denied the fact that the age of the prosecutrix is more than what was narrated by her. Mrs. Marry Josehp (PW-3) wife of the Chaplain where the prosecutrix had gone to work, has stated that on the date of incident she had gone to church along with her husband and when they returned, prosecutrix narrated the fact that she was subjected to rape by the accused/appellant and then she advised her to go and inform her mother. K.K.Joseph (PW-4) has also supported the prosecution case. Dr. Rashmi Singh (PW-6) is the doctor who had medically examined the prosecutrix vide Ex.P-2C. She has stated that the prosecutrix was a minor, her breast were not fully developed and hymen was found intact and that there was no sign of injury on her private part. D.C.Tiwari (retired) (PW-7) Head Constable helped in the investigation. Dr. Mahesh Kumar Singhal (PW-9) had medically examined the accused/appellant vide Ex. P-5 and had not noticed any
