Smt. Hempushpa v. Avinash Kumar Khobragade
Case brief
What is this about?
This court dismissed the appellant's appeal as having become infructuous. No substantive issues were discussed or resolved in the brief order.
This court dismissed the appellant's appeal as having become infructuous. No substantive issues were discussed or resolved in the brief order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
FAM No. 56 of 2015
Present address R/o through Arun Kumar Damle, Cinema Line Ward No.7, Tahsil - Dongargaon, Civil & Revenue Distt. Rajnandgaon (C.G.)
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondents
For Appellant : Shri Ajit Singh, Advocate For Respondent : None
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
Order On Board
By Pritinker Diwaker, J 01/05/2017
Sd/-
Sd/-
(Pritinker Diwaker) (R.C.S. Samant) Judge JUDGE
Vijay
Smt. Hempushpa W/o Shri Avinash Kumar Khobragade
Avinash Kumar Khobragade
Pritinker Diwaker
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court