Smt. Kailash Kumari Rajwar v. State Of Chhattisgarh and another
Case brief
What is this about?
In the high court, the appeal was dismissed because the respondent died, leaving nothing to survive in the appeal.
In the high court, the appeal was dismissed because the respondent died, leaving nothing to survive in the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
ACQA No. 74 of 2016
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
| For Appellant | : Shri Anil Gulati, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent/State | : Shri Adhiraj Surana, Dy. Govt. Advocate |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Pritinker Diwaker
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
Order On Board
12/01/2017
Per Pritinker Diwaker, J.
Sd/Sd/( Pritinker Diwaker) (R.C.S. Samant) Judge Judge
Kamde
Smt. Kailash Kumari Rajwar W/o Sahadar Ram Rajwar
State of Chhattisgarh
Devrup Rajwar S/o Devdhari Rajwar
Pritinker Diwaker
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court