Dismissed

Pradeep Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC19 Dec 2016WPS/6820/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a writ petition regarding employment eligibility. The court ruled that the petitioner could apply for the post of Teacher based on prior judicial observations concerning recruitment. The case was decided by relying on the rationale of a previous judgment.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to be at liberty to apply for the post of Teacher and appear in accordance with law.

Pradeep Kumar Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 6820 of 2016

¶5

Pradeep Kumar Sahu S/o Lalji Sahu, Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Gagori, Post Bhinodi, Tahsil Bhilaigarh, Distirct Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, P.S. Rakhi, Tahsil Arang, Naya Raipur, Distirct Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶9

Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mantralaya P.S. Rakhi, Tahsil Aarang, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶10

Director, Public Instructions, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Baloda Bazar, Distirct Baloda Bazar - Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh

¶12

---- Respondents

¶13

For Petitioner : Mr. CJK Rao, Adv. For Respondents/State : Mr. Prasun Bhaduri, GA on advance copy.

¶14

Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai

¶15

Order On Board

¶16

19/12/2016

¶17

Heard. Issue notice.

¶18

Mr. Bhaduri accepts notice on behalf of respondents. Hence the petitioner is not required to pay separate PF for respondents.

¶19

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that instant petition may be disposed of in the light of order dated 2510-2016 passed in Writ Petition No. 7624/2006 in para 4 and 5 as the present matter is covered by that case.

¶20

Learned counsel for the respondents agreed to the prayer and submits that the instant writ petition may be disposed of in the light of para 4 and 5 of the order dated 25-10-2016 passed in WP No. 7624/2006.

¶21

On due consideration, instant WPS is disposed of under the

¶22

¶23

observation and direction given in para 4 and 5 of the order dated 25-10-2016 passed in W.P. No. 7624/2006 which are reproduced below :

¶24

“4. It is well settled law that absorption of a person not appointed in accordance with the rules would result in denial of equal opportunity in the matter of employment to other eligible candidates for public office (See Union of India and others -vKishan Gopal Vyas reported in (1996) 7 SCC 134). 5. However, if the advertisement is issued for recruitment for the post of Teacher, the petitioners are at liberty to apply for the said post and to appear in accordance with law.”

¶25

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶26

No order as to costs.

¶27

Sd/(Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) Judge

¶28

Pathak

Pradeep Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pradeep Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ramesh Kumar Sahu Vs Shoban Kanwar

Shrawan Kumar Thakur Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh Power And Coal Benefication Limited Vs State Trading Corporation

Zamirur Hasan and Others Vs Sajjan Kumar Agrawal and Others

State Of Chhattisgarh Vs Raj Kamal Mishra

Bhagirathi Sahu Vs State Of Chhattisgarh