Disposed

Shrawan Kumar Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC16 Dec 2016WPS/6812/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition regarding a pending compassionate appointment application following the father's death, the High Court directed the respondents to decide the application within three months without expressing any opinion on the merits of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Respondents 2 & 3 directed to decide the compassionate appointment application within three months from the date of service of this order.

Shrawan Kumar Thakur Vs State Of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.6812 of 2016

¶4

Shrawan Kumar Thakur S/o. Late Shri Jahur Singh Thakur, Aged About 22 Years R/o. Village And Post Raitum, Tahsil Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (Chhattisgarh)

¶5

---- Petitioner

¶6

Versus

¶7

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through : Secretary, Department Of Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶8

2. Collector, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

¶9

3. District Education Officer, Baloda Bazar, District Baloda Bazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh.

¶10

---- Respondents

¶11

For petitioner : Shri CK Sahu, Advocate For respondents : Shri Dhiraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate.

¶12

Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order On Board

¶13

16.12.2016

¶14

Heard.

¶15

2 . Issue notice to the respondents.

¶16

3 . Shri Wankhede accepts notice on behalf of the respondents, with this the petitioner is not required to pay separate process fee for issuance of notice to the respondents.

¶17

4 . Perused the instant petition and the documents annexed.

¶18

5 . Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he has filed an application for compassionate appointment after the death of

¶19

his father Jahur Singh who died on 27.11.1999 while working as Assistant Teacher (Science). The said application was submitted

¶20

¶21

before Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Purgaon, Distt. Baloda Bazar, Bhattapara on 10.01.2013 and the same is pending and respondents 2 & 3 have not decided the said application for compassionate appointment till date.

¶22

6 . On perusal of the entire material placed and argued, the instant writ petition is disposed of.

¶23

7 . Respondents 2 & 3 are directed to decide the aforementioned application within three months on presentation of the copy of the order passed by this Court (if not decided earlier).

¶24

8 . The petitioner may serve a copy of the order along with a copy of application dated 10.01.2013 for disposal of the said application for compassionate appointment.

¶25

9 . It is further clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the instant petition.

¶26

10 . With this direction, the instant petition is disposed of without any appreciation on its merits.

¶27

Sd/-

¶28

(Chandra Bhushan Bajpai)

¶29

JUDGE

¶30

Bini

Shrawan Kumar Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shrawan Kumar Thakur v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shreyash Selarka And Anr. Vs Smt.preena Shukla And Ors.

Amar Chand Jha Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Smt. Basanti Vs Parmeshwari

Ramesh Kumar Sahu Vs Shoban Kanwar

Chhattisgarh Power And Coal Benefication Limited Vs State Trading Corporation

Laxman Das Mahant Vs State Of Chhattisgarh