The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a petition for advance increments by staying on the terms of a previous order, subject to verification of facts.
Petition disposed on similar terms to order dated 04/02/2016 in WPS No.4782/2015, pending verification.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 509 of 2016
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
Shri Sandeep Dubey, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri S.P.Kale, Dy.A.G. for the State.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order On Board
04/08/2016
Earlier, time was granted to the State, but no reply has been filed.
In large number of cases, this Court has passed order with regard to two advance increments. On consideration of orders passed in various cases,
some of such orders are placed on record.
Accordingly, this petition is also disposed off on the similar terms as order dated 04/02/2016 passed in WPS No.4782/2015 and if the petitioners, upon verification of facts, are found to be similarly situated, the same benefit may be granted to the petitioners also.
Sd/-
(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge
Deepti
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners are entitled to advance increments on similar terms as established in prior jurisprudence.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
order dated 04/02/2016 passed in WPS No.4782/2015Referred¶22
Bahadur Singh Marko
Hoshal Singh Paikra
Janak Ram Yadav
Ibrahim Sheikh
State Of Chhattisgarh
The District Education Officer, Bilaspur
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
