A writ petition filed by employees of the Food Corporation of India was dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on their behalf to argue the case despite it being called.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPS No. 4628 of 2016
---- Petitioners
Versus
| ---- Respondents | |
|---|---|
| 22/09/2016 santosh |
None for the petitioners. Mr. N.K. Vyash, Assistant Solicitor General for the Union of India. Since no one appears on behalf of the petitioners to argue the case, even when the case is called in the second round, this court is left with no other option but to dismiss the instant writ petition for want of prosecution. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge |
Surendra Kumar S/o Late Shri Sitaram Mahto and others
Union of India Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food & Public Distribution
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
