The Chhattisgarh High Court allowed the applicant's application for restoration of MCC No. 34/2016, which had been dismissed for want of prosecution, finding sufficient cause was explained for non-appearance.
The order dismissing MCC 34/2016 for want of prosecution dated 16.08.2016 is recalled and the motion is restored.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 691 of 2016
Smt. Sadhna Tiwari, Wd/o Late Sarda Tiwari, Aged About 50 Years R/o Infront Of Railway Station, Jawahar Para, Champa, P.S. Champa, Tahsil Champa, Civil And Revenue District JanjgirChampa, Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
.................(Driver)
................(Owner)
................(Insurer)
---- Respondents
For Applicant :- Mr. Amit Kumar Sharma, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order On Board
22/09/2016
opinion that sufficient cause has been explained by the counsel for the applicant for his non-appearance on 16.08.2016.
Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Santosh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration of Motions-in-Chamber No. 34/2016, dismissed for want of prosecution, could be allowed after sufficient cause was explained.
Smt. Sadhna Tiwari
Laxman Shriwas @ Suddhu
Vikash Kumar Agrawal
The Oriental Insurance Company Limited
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
