The High Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs, lacking substantive legal issues.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.3206 of 2010
Anurag Lal, Deputy Secretary/Appellate Authority (According to provisions of Right to Information Act), S/o Shri R.M.Lal, aged about 46 years, R/o Labour Department, D.K.S.Bhawan, Raipur (CG)
----Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner : Mr.Sunil Otwani & Mr.Sushil Sahu, Advocates For Respondent No.1 : Mr.Shyam Tekchandani, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
4/10/2016
this Court to withdraw this writ petition.
to cost(s).
Sd/-
(Sanjay K Agrawal) Judge
B/-
Anurag Lal
Chhattisgarh State Information Commission
Shri Satya Prakash Sharma
Sanjay K Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
