Dismissed
T.R.Sahu and Ors. v. State and Ors.
Chhattisgarh HCWPS/2628/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
•ER: ?BBR..T'BEI a : ::Cu?iglBai.^Agja;S]e!aM…
What the court decided
AI extract
•ER: ?BBR..T'BEI a : ::Cu?iglBai.^Agja;S]e!aM…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
•Sf!-^^ m
Uffl 99 iia^^lll^ ::i.an
-•-•l.a:
s'^
n
:1^'^;!
j «SRE^.M.P«.'SSKS'S.^.K^SnSXSXKWE/B. •ER:
?BBR..T'BEI a:
::Cu?iglBai.^Agja;S]e!aMeia;'' Ke'..
"s~. • : /''. .' . •'• •' • • ' • ' • '''• '•Bflitweea- ,: .'. • • , ' . - -.;^lty'^1"'"""'' "::'..'. . "^"..'.;'.:;''.'. . (1) :T,.R.;.Sahu.:S/p.A^u..Raa','Sahu: •', ;. . -;, • \ .; ' ;. . Ageff 4y~years,; 8/a IteBpgn-»SlstAi.Rajnandgaoit» ^ (2) ABoiaraM':Sahul:.s/'e;::AweJraa.Sa.faa:.,.' :,.,• '. :: ::; ' -, d'^'SrS-;;y^aFS^;x/®:;.B0i,B»M.»©£sfct»Burg.':. (3) Eilaran°'aaHWa2K;;S/o .SaXalQEara^Kanwar . ; ',•.
:'-.III-:j91
aged Sl.years^ R/©TulIa,®I.ttRaj.iiar.
ag^ S5 years S/o Sl-awlsl., lai.s'tt.Rajaaadgsoft
: • • i '-::' (S) R.R.' Misha<3's/o':?*R»'iS'!shsd^: .. .
1'K-ai
age<a;,47,;yeeuE's,;'R/o;:Bsaetha:KBa2ar^ , • •',. ' .' ' ,aiafet»:.RB'jBaBaspoR/.::,:'l,..-.'' ;;.;
^ -N
(6) S.P.BeatewIch S/sy x»1*, BashmM*
Bll
CJ)
:sged 44 yaarsy R/<»Dettad.l., Btsfet.B'uBTg.
.SmK.'D.M.^aBBgia ti/o^P»0.'^Raac|gt''1"". ' ':. .'.^ :'.1 •'
«9ieel''4^yrs«:'B/o-iteUBKit.t'.&ist^.iEgurg.. ' .y,:-!.1 '•:
Vf&.- •S&6^^SSsa^''S/e.^t:-Sta^.fe^^^V'ha'^:
''":;JjiJ|
—'t
EilwS Kl?
Ms:':^' "£'
'^^.•:j.ij ;?;(^;il 1:'WB •^ys illlll iffllffi ^^^it v4:
agefl 4S;1:yeaE^»'8^~!["Bsnaax»,;:l^ «8Hrg..:^:;:'1,'':1-
i^-A.^S.;fe
m
:i%a.t.e5®£:,M,,,P.,j;jihFQtt§^'i'.Se<a?!e<WE'^
"3S:-4.B^£^I«»l3a£'egS%]f>tste*;'J?,',,l ,:^^^ ^' ^;
;»»a.I.aB)ii.a|iswtt^i;,;E^!isQ.S<ai,>a>»i):l*;:'y
H^^U^^IiiBl^'^
ti'
i{iji:)ia^^^ 's'Sisi'
' - ., ;i,.2 i,s ^ :,
Coiaialssj.oBe.E-, TtTAIaaX welfare Depfct* Satpada Bbawaa, Bbopal (H.P.)
Regional By. Oenri.ssionsr* &AbaI Weljfiare Depfet. •i!?1 Jal Wibar Coloay, RalguFd ••»..» - •• 0 .RESgOBIBeBTS.,1/':a|
••tsw»x!asaeiSS<l^!vr
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH. BILASPUB_
WPSNo,2619 of 2005
Mohanlal Dilliwal And Ors.
f"
•^hi
-—
Petitioner
Versus
• State of IVBK And Ors.
-—
Respondent
And
WPS No. 2628 Of 2005
T.R. SahuAndOrs.
——
Petitioner
Vs
State of M.P. And Ors.
-—
Respondent
For Petitioners : None.
For Respondent/State : Shri S. Majid Ali, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
05/04/2016
1. When the matter is called out, none appears on behalf of the petitioners. No
representation is made. Even on 2nd call, none appears for the petitfoners.
2. -In the -"circumstances, the Writ Petitions are .dismissed for want of
prosecutlon. •——--~ —-
•——--~
~ •311
Sd//-' .
Prashaht Kumar Mishra
Judge
Barve
Mohanlal Dilliwal And Ors.
T.R. Sahu And Ors.
State of Chhattisgarh
State of M.P.
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court