A petition challenging non-retrospective pay fixation for a professor. The court held that cadre membership commences only upon the issuance of an appointment order and joining duty, not the date of selection by the PSC. Consequently, the claim for backdated benefits was dismissed as lacking substance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE mg; STATE mmswm‘lva TRIBUNAL :‘ Jwmua _ 3wcarJ”&9UR; Mbp‘ My 9oM§oV2€W$ o; 1_996 I , . APPLICmT ‘ :- ‘Dffrmaxiharanlal Jgarwal.7 S/‘c Shri‘B.P. \ Agarwal aged, chant 61 years raa¢ent of 13 School Raadchoube mlany ’ € ’ mipur. Tahsil, and mstrict ' 9 Raipur'WP)‘. ,1 v _ v gasvsv
t :f l. Tho ' stat‘a af Madh’ya :Pradesh Through tin Secretary min pawerEmpeyment Department I Vgllabh_Bh’awaaBhopalwl’h ’rhe 2. Director rachnic‘al adncatioél /af M.P. Satpuda Bhawan 4th flea: ‘ Bhepal (MP h
(iv) suggg: IN ggEE :-
Teh IPP%i§antwas sent-with a letter ‘ ‘ d ated/u 5§_11.8‘5 by m.'§.p;ubli¢ sgrvicée bommissién I declar‘n‘g. him ta agmiaiheiu ihfnieifit lut,» copy o’f which/is filed as. mnéxuu, Ml». The ‘ appliqautiwas given senioiit'y as cleiarf ffom ‘ia‘reG’. ll'ette‘rvdat‘ed/ig 15.5.96 pvar Dr. sham é ‘, and bevneth, Dr. J.P.')§aawél aé ‘P‘mlkf'ess'a‘x; ‘whitm is 'the' after fdate éfwre'tiiél‘ént.a therefofe‘ péfinnnt l i'.0u20
agedabout,47 Biiaspul‘(C.G.) Agrawal, Dr.ML. Nagar,Bilaspur Vinoba b .PrashamAgrawal, ‘dent of HousesonofNo. Late 14/235, L—7
aNAFR
HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARHV, BILA§PURV
WPS No.1415of2905
0
Smt. SumanAgrawalamdothers
—-~— Petitioner ¥
Versus
o The StateofMadhyaPradeshandanother
Respondent
For Petitioners Mr. HLVBQ'Agarwal,SeniorAdvocatewith ' . Ms.lturaniMukherjee,Advocate Mr. ShashankThakur,GovernmentAdvocate For State
For Petitioners
Hon'ble Shri JusticeFreshantKumarMishra Order QnABoard ' I I gsmzgw
. Heard.
6'2?
t
i 3. it is arguedthatthe petitionerwasselectedbythePSCon 05.11.1985,however,theinitialpostingorderwasissued on 10th of March19086,forwhich,thepetitionercannotbe blamed, therefore,the petitionerisentitledtopayfixation from OS111985
order ofappointment.
in the case in hand, the order OF appoihtmentwasissued on 10.03.1986, whereupon, the petitioner joined on the post on 12.03.1986, therefore, the petitioner has been grantedbenefitof payfixationafterhisappointmentand not from a date priortohisappointment.
Sdl-
Judge
’ (PrashantKumarMishra)
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an employee selected by the Public Service Commission on 05.11.1985 is entitled to pay fixation benefits retrospectively from that date or only from the date of appointment.
Whether a person becomes a member of a cadre on the date of selection or on the date the appointment order is issued.
Smt. Suman Agrawal and others
The State of Madhya Pradesh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
