In WP227 No. 6631 of 2009, the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur, dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution as no representative appeared for the petitioner despite the matter being called in the second round on 01/12/2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 6631 of 2009
Kholbahra Manikpur, aged about 58 years, son of Sarhadas Manikpuri, Resident of Village Turma, Sub Tahsil Lavan, Tahsil Balodabazar, District Raipur (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : None for the petitioner. For Respondent No. 6 : Shri Aditya Sharma, PL
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
01/12/2016
(1) Even after the matter was called in the second round, none appeared for the petitioner, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the writ petition for want of prosecution.
(2) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
D/-
Kholbahra Manikpur
State of Chhattisgarh
Muritdas Manikpuri
Board of Revenue, Chhattisgarh Bilaspur
Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Balodabazar
Naib Tahsildar Lavan
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
