Writ petition dismissed as infructuous because the grant period of the transport permit to the respondent had expired by the time of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP (227) No.4096 of 2010
Smt.Kamaljeet Kaur, 43 Yrs., wd/o Late Satwant Singh Gill, Shukla Colony, Rajatalab, Raipur
---- Petitioner
Versus
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Petitioner : Mr.Raja Sharma, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
07/12/2016
permit was granted has already been expired, the writ petition has become infructuous and it is dismissed as having become infructuous. However, the petitioner is at liberty to make an objection on renewal of respondent No.2, if so advised or to challenge the renewal, if any, before the competent forum. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/-
(Sanjay K Agrawal) Judge
B/-
Smt. Kamaljeet Kaur
Regional Transport Authority, Chhattisgarh
Prempal Singh
Sanjay K Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
