Gourishankar Sinha Vs the State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

The petitioner had challenged the order dated 12-3-1999 in O.A. No.869/1999 before the State Administrative Tribunal, Bench at Raipur, later-on transferred to this Court and numbered as W.P.(S) No.3060/2005 which was dismissed for want of prosecution on 244-2012. During the pendency of the first writ petition i.e. W.P.(S) No.3060/2005, the petitioner has filed second writ petition i.e. the instant writ petition namely W.P.No.2874/2004 challenging the order dated 12-3-1999. The first substantive writ petition has been dismissed for want of prosecution therefore, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 12-3-1999, which was the subject

¶19

W.P.No.2874/2004

¶20

Page 2 of 2

¶21

matter of the first writ petition also, in the instant writ petition and the second writ petition on the same cause of action is not maintainable. The petitioner cannot be allowed to maintain two writ petitions on one cause of action.

¶22

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as not maintainable. However, the petitioner is at liberty to proceed in accordance with law. No order as to cost(s).

¶23

Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge

¶24

Soma

Gourishankar Sinha v. the State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gourishankar Sinha v. the State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sadhuram and Ors. Vs the State of Madhya Pradesh

Hakkad Vs the State of Chhattisgarh

Lakhan Lal Vs Hit Narayan and Others

Smt.Kamaljeet Kaur Vs Regional Transport Authority and Anr.

Smt. Kamaljeet Kaur Vs Regional Transport Authority and Ors.

Lakhi Vs Executive Engineer, Pwd, Raipur