In a writ petition challenging the closure of evidence, the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Balrampur granted the petitioner additional time to examine four witnesses but imposed a cost deposit condition and directed the trial court to expedite proceedings.
Opportunity granted to examine four witnesses within two months upon deposit of Rs. 2000 cost.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 402 of 2016
---- Petitioner
Versus
(B) Shiv Ram Soni, S/o Jagannath, Aged About 50 Years R/o Sonarpara, Champa, P.S. Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh)
(C) Janak Soni S/o Jagannath, Aged About 45 Years R/o Sonarpara, Champa, P.S. Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh)
(D) Mamta Soni, W/o Ashok Soni, Aged About 40 Years R/o Narmada Nagar, P. S. Civil Line, Bilaspur, Revenue And Civil District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
(E) Beni W/o Laxminarayan Soni, Aged About 47 Years D/o Jagannath, R/o Sonarpara, Champa, P. S. Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh)
(F) Heerabai Wd/o Late Ganesh Prasad @ Bhurau, Aged About 60 Years R/o Village- Kotamisonar, P. S. Akaltara, Through- Akaltara, District- JanjgirChampa (Chhattisgarh)
(G) Gonda Bai Soni, W/o Rajkumar, Aged About 50 Years R/o Opposite Post Office, Jaijaipur, Main Road, Jaijaipur, P. S. Jaijaipur, District- JanjgirChampa (Chhattisgarh)
(B) Ravi Soni, S/o Ramesh Soni, Aged About 35 Years R/o Mahamaya Chowk, Sarkanda, P. S. Sarkanda, District- Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
(C) Smt. Rakhi Soni, W/o Jitendra Kumar, Aged About 30 Years ThroughPradeep Kumar, Sonarpara, Champa, P. S. Champa, Tahsil- Champa, District- Janjgir-Champa (Chhattisgarh)
2
Mahamaya Chowk, Thana Road, Ratanpur, P. S. Ratanpur, DistrictBilaspur (Chhattisgarh)
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Shri PK Tulsyan, Advocate For Respondents-State : Shri Shashank Thakur, GA for the State
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
04/07/2016
3
adjournment on 22-3-16 does not appear to be without any basis.
Sd/-
Judge Prashant Kumar Mishra
ashu
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner suffering from cancer should be permitted to examine remaining witnesses despite previous delays.
Whether the petitioner is required to deposit costs before being allowed to examine witnesses.
Whether the trial court should expedite the conclusion of the trial.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Dr. Gendlal Saraf
A. Phool Bai
Shiv Ram Soni
Janak Soni
Mamta Soni
Beni
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
