The single judge dismissed the Matrimonial Causes Cell (MCC) petition on withdrawal by the counsel for the petitioners.
Permission to withdraw MCC petition was granted; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 442 of 2016
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For Petitioner Mr. Pallav Mishra, Advocate For Respondent /State Mrs. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
4/7/2016
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this MCC.
Permission granted.
Accordingly, the MCC is dismissed, as withdrawn.
Sd/-
Judge
(Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Shyna
Naveen Kurre S/o Tahlu Ram Satnami
Sonu Satnami S/o Baliram
State Of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
