Uttam Rao Mathankar and Anr. v. the State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR…
COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(§rwo‘
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR x W.?.No. 397 12004 V
P etition ers 1. Uttam Ran Mathankar Slo Shri \AKnshnaRanMathankar awed about 31 (3V? years Rio I’umna Sarkanda B11aspm~ (C.G.)
Shiv Raj Singh Gond S/o Shri Gulab Singh Goad, aged about 32 years, Rio H- 24 Nutan Coiony, New Sarkanda, Biiaspur-(C.G.)
State of Chhattisgarh through the
Secretaxy Social Welfare Deamnent,
Raipur-(C.G.)
The Director, Panchayat & Socia} Welfare Department, DKS Bhawan, Raipur-(C.G.) The Jnim Direcmr Pannhayat & Social Welfara, Bilaspur-(C.G.)
The Dy.Contmllex', Government Braille
Press Tifra, Bilaspur-(C.G.)
<br>5. Mr Jageshwar Gond Sfa Unknown Prnof
Reader Brarlle Press Trfra Brlaspur-
(C G }
1/
WRIT PETITION UNDER ARTICLE 2261227 QF THE
CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
NAFR
HIGH COURTOFCHHATTISGARH,BILASPUR
WP No. 307 of 2004
Uttam RaoMathankar&Anr.
---- Petitioners
Versus
The StateOfChhattisgarh&Ors.
----' Respondents
For Petitioners : Shri VijayK.Deshmukh,Advocate For Respondent—State : ShriSLP.Kale,Dy.AdvocateGeneral.
S.B.:Hon'bleShriJuéticeManindraMohanShrivastava LOrder‘On Board
09/08/2016
Heard.
Learnedcounselforthe petitionersseekstowithdrawthispetition at this stage.
Accordingly,this petitionisdismissedaswithdrawn
i i/ Sd/— ‘ ManindraMohanShrivastava r/ ~ Judge / // ‘ .
r We
i . //
Uttam Rao Mathankar & Anr.
The State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court