This Court held that the respondent passed the substantive order on date 02/08/2016. The case was a contempt petition regarding the correctness of that order. The Court reserved liberty to the petitioner to challenge the order on merits.
Contempt petition closed, rule discharged. Liberty to challenge the order on merits reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONT No. 283 of 2016
Pradeep Sahu S/o Late Shri Bodhram Sahu, Aged About 51 Years R/o Kashi Nagar, Korba, Posted As IV Grade Employee, At Present Collectorate Korba, DistrictKorba, Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
A. K. Verma Aged About 58 Years, Principal-In-Charge Training Superintendent Balak I T C, Rampur, Korba Qr. No. A-4, I T I Rampur Compound Korba, DistrictKorba, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
Shri Sandeep Dubey, counsel for the petitioner/s. Shri Vipin Tiwari, counsel for the respondent.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
Order On Board
09/08/2016
At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent submits that in compliance of the order of this Court, the respondent has passed an order on 02/08/2016.
this contempt petition is liable to be closed and is accordingly closed. Rule is discharged.
Sd/(Manindra Mohan Shrivastava) Judge
Deepti
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the respondent was in willful disobedience of the earlier order of this Court.
Pradeep Sahu
A. K. Verma
Manindra Mohan Shrivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
