The High Court dismissed the writ appeal as not maintainable. It held that an appeal under the Chhattisgarh High Court (Appeal to Division Bench) Act, 2006 cannot be filed against an interlocutory order allowing an intervention application.
The writ appeal is dismissed as not maintainable.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Appeal No. 665 of 2015
Abhay Singh S/o Late Shri Premsingh, Aged About 36 Years Permanent R/o Shankargarh, P.S. Shankargarh, District Balrampur Present Address Babupara Central Jail Colony, Ambikapur Chhattisgarh
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
For Appellant : Shri S.C.Verma, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Shri UNS Deo, Government Advocate For Intervenor : Shri A.V.Shridhar, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri P. Sam Koshy, J.
Judgment on Board
Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice
12/01/2016
2
Sd/- Sd/(Navin Sinha) (P. Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE
Anu
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal against an order declining to modify a previous order allowing intervention is maintainable.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Abhay Singh S/o Late Shri Premsingh
The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Revenue Department
Navin Sinha
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
