Dismissed

Bramhanand Rathiya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC4 Jan 2016WA/611/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court allowed intra-court applications for condonation of delay, amendment, and production of documents, then dismissed the writ appeal which had been withdrawn by appellants reserving liberty to approach the Court again.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay, leave to amend title and produce documents allowed; appeal dismissed as withdrawn with liberty reserved.

Bramhanand Rathiya Vs State Of Chhattisgarh — Service and Employment | Chhattisgarh HC (2016)

¶1

NAFR

¶2

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶3

Writ Appeal No.611 of 2015

¶4

Bramhanand Rathiya S/o Shri Jagdev Singh Rathiya, aged about 31 years, R/o Mahrajganj, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

¶5

Smt. Sharda Bai Rathiya, W/o Babulal Rathiya, R/o Mahrajganj, Post Mahrajganj, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

¶6

Smt. Faguni Rathiya, W/o Devendra Kumar, aged about 25 years, R/o Khamhar, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

¶7

Smt. Sandhya Bhagat W/o Sunil Bhagat, aged about 24 years, R/o Village Loing, Tahsil and District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

¶8

Ku. Chandrakanti Pradhan D/o Bheema Pradhan, aged about 25 years, R/o Village Mulumura, Tahsil Baramkela, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

¶9

Tuaal Sai Yadav, S/o Shri Dilawar Yadav, aged about 21 years, R/o Chhal, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

¶10

Yogeshwari Sidar, D/o Raghuvir Sidar, aged about 24 years, R/o Turekela, Post Jharadih, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

¶11

Smt. Dhaneshwari Bai Rathiya, Wife of Chitrabhan Rathiya, aged about 23 years, R/o Village Jogra, Post Hati, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

¶12

Duleram Rathiya, S/o Tihar Sai Rathiya, aged about 24 years, R/o Bagarsuta, Tahsil Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

¶13

10.Munna Lal Rathiya, S/o Gambhir Singh Rathiya, aged about 22 years, R/o Nandgaon, Tahsil Kharsiya, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

¶14

---Appellants

¶15

versus

¶16

State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶17

The Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶18

The Secretary, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Development Department, Government of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶19

The Commissioner, Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe Development, Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

¶20

The Collector, Raigarh, District Raigarh (Chhattisgarh)

¶21

---- Respondents

¶22

For Appellants : Shri Kamlesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate For State/Respondents : Shri U.N.S. Deo, Government Advocate

¶23

¶24

Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy

¶25

Order on Board

¶26

Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice

¶27

4/1/2016

¶28

1 . I.A. No.1 of 2015 has been filed to condone delay of 10 days in preferring the appeal. Considering the duration, I.A. No.1 of 2015 is allowed and delay is condoned.

¶29

2 . I.A. No.2 of 2015 filed for amendment in the cause-title by impleading some of the Writ Petitioners as proforma Respondents is also allowed.

¶30

3 . I.A. No.3 of 2015 with regard to illegible pages is also allowed.

¶31

4 . After some argument, Learned Counsel for the Appellants prays for leave to withdraw the appeal reserving the right to approach the Court again if the Respondents proceed to make any recovery pursuant to the orders dated 20.11.2014 and 7.11.2014 with regard to the scale paid to them before expiry of three years.

¶32

5 . The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn reserving the aforesaid liberty

¶33

to the Appellants.

¶34

Sd/Sd/( Navin Sinha ) ( P. Sam Koshy ) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE

¶35

Gopal

Bramhanand Rathiya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bramhanand Rathiya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahendra Kumar Salam Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Jitendra Kumar Netam Vs State of Chhattisgarh and Ors.

Priyanka Krishna Dutta Vs Union Of India and Ors.

Vikas Dubey Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Anr.

Bashan Bai And Anr. Vs State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors.

Smt. Shweta Methews Vs State Of Chhattisgarh