The High Court allowed a Writ Appeal by Mutual Agreement, holding that the controversy was fully covered by an analogous order, without adjudicating specific legal issues.
The present appeal is allowed in similar terms to the order dated 9.12.2015 in Writ Appeal No. 32 of 2015 and analogous appeals.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Appeal No. 60 of 2015
Vikas Dubey S/o Shri Shyam Karnik Dubey, aged about 34 years, R/o Front of Nawapara Church, Govt. House G-2, Police Station Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) Presently posted as Lecturer, Panchayat, Shiksha Karmi I, Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Karji, District Sarguja, Chhattisgarh..
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
For Appellant : Shri Mateen Siddique, Advocate. For Respondents/State : Shri B. Gopa Kumar, Deputy Advocate General.
Hon'ble Shri Navin Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri P. Sam Koshy, J.
Judgment on Board
Per Navin Sinha, Chief Justice
04/01/2016
Sd/Sd/(Navin Sinha) (P. Sam Koshy) CHIEF JUSTICE JUDGE
Subbu
Navin Sinha
P Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
