In Second Appeal No. 336 of 2005, the High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur dismissed the appeal for want of prosecution as the appellant failed to appear after the matter was called for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Second Appeal No. 336 of 200 5
Minor No. 3 represented by No. 2 Mother & natural guardian
All R/o Amar Chowk, Rajatalab, Raipur, Tah. & Distt. Raipur (C.G.)
---- Appellants
Versus
---- Respondents
For appellants : None For Respondents : None
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
0 6 / 1 0/2016
(1) Even after the matter was called in the second round, none appeared for
the appellant, therefore, in these circumstances, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the second appeal for want of prosecution.
(2) Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal)
Judge
D/-
2
Poonamchand, S/o Khemji; Sangeeta Ingley, Wd./o Umashankar; Dishaarath, S/o Umashankar
Mus. Premabai, W/o Chotelal; Chotelal, S/o Ramnath
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
