Review petition filed to correct a clerical error regarding the name of the counsel for respondent No. 1 in an order. The court directed the correction of the name.
Name of counsel for respondent No.1 in order dated 29.06.2016 be read as Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Review Petition No.127 of 2016
Ramdev, S/o Shri Dalsai, aged about 66 years, R/o. Bhitthikala, Police Station & Post Ambikapur, Civil & Revenue District Sarguja (CG).
---- Petitioner
Versus
---Respondents
For Petitioner : Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla, Advocate For Respondents : Shri Satish Gupta, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
02/09/2016
(2) The petitioner has filed this petition for correction in order dated 29.06.2016 passed in S.A. No.584 of 2015.
(3) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in order dated 29.06.2016, the name of counsel for the respondent No.1 has wrongly mentioned as Shri Anand Kumar Shukla whereas it is Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla and therefore, same may be corrected.
(4) In view of above, it is directed that the name of counsel for
2
respondent No.1 in place of Shri Anand Kumar Shukla it be read as Shri Ashok Kumar Shukla in order dated 29.06.2016 passed in S.A.No.584/2015. Other contents of order dated 29.06.2016 shall remain intact.
(5) With the aforesaid clarification, the petition stands finally disposed of.
(6) Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
L/-
Ramdev
Surendra Yadav
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
