In a petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C regarding an abetment of suicide case, the High Court of Chhattisgarh, relying on parity with a co-accused, allowed anticipatory bail subject to personal bonds and standard conditions.
Anticipatory bail allowed; applicant to execute personal bond for Rs. 25,000 with one local surety.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 958 of 2016
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Applicant : Ms. Pritha Ghoshal, Advocate For Respondent/State : Mr. U.K.S. Chandel, Panel Lawyer -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
19-10-2016
2
order dated 10-8-2016 passed by this Court in M.Cr.C (A) No. 690 of 2016, therefore, the applicant may also be granted benefit of anticipatory bail on the ground of parity.
(I) that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation before the Investigating Officer as and when required.
(ii) that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise
3
to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him/her from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;
(iii) that the applicant shall not act, in any manner, which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial; and
(iv) the applicant shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to him by the
said Court till disposal of the trial.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) Judge
Raju
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant on grounds of parity with a similarly placed co-accused?
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Order dated 10-8-2016Relied on¶14
M.Cr.C (A) No. 690 of 2016
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Prakash Chand Jain
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
