In an anticipatory bail application filed apprehending arrest in connection with an excise offence, the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the prayer. The court relied on the seizure occurring at the applicants' property and the bar under the Chhattisgarh Excise Act.
Application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. for anticipatory bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
M.Cr.C.(A) No. 461 of 2016
---- Applicants
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station Bhatapara (Gramin), Civil And Revenue Distt. Baloda BazarBhatapara Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For applicants – Shri A.P. Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent/State – Shri Vinod Tekam, PL.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order
15/07/2016
2
anticipatory bail.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri)
JUDGE
gouri
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to applicants apprehending arrest under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in an excise offence.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Sanjay Kumar
Ajay Kumar
Kush Verma
State of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
