The High Court of Chhattisgarh rejected a bail application filed under Section 439 CrPC. The court refused to enlarge the petitioner on bail after finding that stolen ornaments were recovered from his possession, despite his denial of involvement.
Bail application was rejected.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 3645 of 2016
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
For the applicant : Mr. Yogesh Pandey Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Sumit Jhawar, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order on Board
14.07.2016
applicant is not involved in the theft and he has been falsely inculpated on the basis of statement of Suraj Yadav and the main allegations are against Suraj Yadav who committed theft and sold it to the applicant, therefore, the connection with respect to the fact that the applicant has stolen the goods as narrated in the statement of accused Suraj is missing. It is further submitted that the applicant is in jail since 25.02.2016, therefore, looking to the period of detention, he may be enlarged on bail.
Sd/-
GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE
R a o
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant in connection with the offence of theft.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shekh Sadab S/o Shekh Jamil
State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Basantpur
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
