This order dismisses an application for bail under Section 379 IPC. The High Court held that with other accused absconding and recovery of stolen cash, bail was not warranted.
Application for grant of bail dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 3536 of 2016
Pintu Nut S/o Sundarlal Nut Aged About 32 Years R/o Divanpur, P.S. Patthalgaon, District - Jashpur Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Manendragarh, Distt. - Koria Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
For applicant – Shri Rajesh Jain, Advocate. For Respondent/State – Shri Vinod Tekam, PL.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order
13/07/2016
2
submits that the applicant may be released on bail.
the evidence available from the master key lock of dickey of the motorcycle was opened by the other co-accused and the amount was stolen. Taking into such facts and circumstances of the case and also for the fact that other co-accused is still absconding, this court is not inclined
to release the applicant on bail.
Sd/-
(Goutam Bhaduri)
JUDGE
gouri
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant should be released on bail when the case involves theft with a co-accused still absconding?
Pintu Nut
State Of Chhattisgarh
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
