High Court dismissed Writ Petition No.495 of 2016 as infructuous on the submission that the impugned order had been withdrawn. The court held the petitioner could approach the court if a grievance arose in the future.
Writ petition dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No.495 of 2016
Ku.Bindavati Dhruw daugher of Shri Tiharu Ram Dhruw, aged about 27 years, working as Shiksha Karmi Grade-3 (Assistant Teacher Panchayat), Primary School Palaud, Police Station-Abhanpur, DistrictRaipur (CG)
---Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur (CG)
2. The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raipur, DistrictRaipur (CG)
3. The Chief Execurive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Abhanpur, District-Raipur (CG)
---Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Khetrapal, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Dhiraj Wankhede, G.A.
Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board
04/04/2016
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that impugned order dated 24.11.2015 (Annexure P/1) has been withdrawn, as such, the present petition has become infractuous.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infractuous. However, the petitioner is free to proceed in accordance with law if grievance arises in future. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/-
(Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE
B/-
Ku. Bindavati Dhruw
State of Chhattisgarh, through the Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Department
The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat, Raipur
The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Abhanpur
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
